| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. R.I.P. scotty the docking manager - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
He's alive and well. He's playing World of Tanks.
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.07.15 14:40:00
|
2. Rate the avatar above - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Always nice to see someone with the balls to go bald in a natural way. 7/10 Frango.
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.07.05 20:30:00
|
3. Remove clones and high SP. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Jason Edwards Do newbs and pvpers really need to be punished? I doubt people are really losing SP at any real rate anyway. So why keep a needlessly complicated system? Because it keeps monthly subscriptions coming in. ...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.06.16 22:43:00
|
4. Anti-Money Laundering Laws - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Bagehi Edited by: Bagehi on 22/04/2011 17:13:50 1. You may notice that CONCORD does not have sov anywhere. Is it ignorant NC mouthpiece day? I must have missed the memo. Concord DOES hold sovereignty. The Sanctu...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.22 18:28:00
|
5. Why Sov Mechanics? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Derrick Lang Stations are controlled by corporations. So the question really becomes "How do we determine who controls a station?" There is already a station capture mechanic, but it is tied to the sov mechanic. I think stat...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.22 15:05:00
|
6. [Proposal] Balance Supercarriers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: bartos100 Originally by: Rika Jones Want to make dreadnoughts effective in PvP vs. Supercarriers? Add two new modules: [a] Capital Warp Disruptor, with SCs not immune to it. [b] Propulsion-Inhibitor Sphere. Much l...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.21 18:28:00
|
7. [Proposal] Balance Supercarriers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Want to make dreadnoughts effective in PvP vs. Supercarriers? Add two new modules: [a] Capital Warp Disruptor, with SCs not immune to it. [b] Propulsion-Inhibitor Sphere. Much like an interdiction sphere, but it reduces all propulsion within 30...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.21 16:10:00
|
8. Feedback Request: Anomaly Changes - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Antihrist Pripravnik Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik on 21/04/2011 03:29:35 Sanctums, especially because they are paid for by the owners of the system, should be available just like level 4 missions are available to anyo...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.21 14:21:00
|
9. Feedback Request: Anomaly Changes - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Viribus People in my corp are reporting over 100m an hour in a solo tengu blitzing L4s for 5-run BPCs. They should have been there all along, then. A Carrier running sanctums pulls, on average, 25mil per bounty cycle (...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.20 08:19:00
|
10. Summit Topic: Team BFF & the Thousand Little Things. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto If I read you right, it's called the passive setting. I'm still clicking if I don't have aggro.
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.19 22:39:00
|
11. Summit Topic: POS Misery - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
My corporation should not automatically own any PoS I purchase and bring online. I should not have to have starbase config roles in order to online a PoS in NPC-controlled systems. If I want to set up a research station for myself in highsec, l...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.19 22:25:00
|
12. Feedback Request: Anomaly Changes - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: The Mittani Constructive Feedback: "Since the anom nerf, I and four of my corpmates have moved our moneymaking alts to hisec, where we run L4 missions. There's no risk there, and we're making X isk/hour (provide figures). Wh...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.19 22:12:00
|
13. Summit Topic: Team BFF & the Thousand Little Things. - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Drones apparently hate large collidable objects with the intensity of a thousand suns. After 4 years of subscriptions, I'd be pleased as punch if the next time I ran a "station" sanctum, I wasn't forced into a click-fight with my drones in order ...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.19 21:10:00
|
14. Summit Topic: Nullsec Industrialization ("Farms and Fields") - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: The Mittani The Farms and Fields topic, making Nullsec less dependent on Jita for everything, providing farms and fields for small-gang targets beyond sov structures. This may degenerate into a 'for gods sakes implement the ...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.19 20:57:00
|
15. Petition to unnerf the 0.0 systems - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Mark Wolf Unerf it! If an alliance can raise the isk involved, and logistically manage to get i-hubs and upgrades out here, then they damn well deserve a decent reward from doing so. It still doesnt make your space safe at t...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.18 15:24:00
|
16. Latest Dev Blog - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: FinnAgain Zero Trolling by using a fake quote instead of addressing my actual argument. Refusing to address my actual argument about the principles behind sandbox play and pretending that it's "fake concern" so you can handw...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.16 06:00:00
|
17. [CSM6]So the Goons and NC control the CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: LordElfa Good. I posted this elsewhere and I'll post it here as well. Look, the fact is that while the Goons and NC may be ruthless bastards, they actually do care about and have time and money invested in EVE. They want th...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.16 05:43:00
|
18. Nerfing the income of the little guy - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Lord Zim Since the problem the anom nerf was supposed to fix was isk inflation, why not just change the way anoms work from giving bounties to giving modules that must be sold to gain said isk, or LPs? That way the anoms (an...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.15 18:01:00
|
19. Why 0.0 sov system just doesn't work - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: CelticRanger On first impression the idea of being able to attack structures and take systems and stations in 0.0 sounded great. The exciting idea of banding together a great fleet and taking a system from the enemy sounded ...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.14 18:56:00
|
20. The reason why I am an "AFK Cloaker" - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: HOwareyoutoday Originally by: King Rothgar An accurate description of afk cloaking and it's intention. I wish local would be removed, it would make afk cloaking pointless and always give a sneaky solo pilot the eleme...
- by Rika Jones - at 2011.04.14 17:59:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |